13号避难所

 找回密码
 立即注册
搜索
楼主: rlucky
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[测试]你属于龙与地下城中的何种阵营?

[复制链接]
124#
发表于 2008-5-18 13:00:04 | 只看该作者
中立善良(Neutral Good):中立善良者尽其所能做着一个好人能做的事情。他致力于帮助别人。他配合国王和大臣们的工作,但并不感到蒙恩于其。中立善良的寻常称谓是“真正善良”。中立善良是一个行善且对秩序即不偏爱也不反抗的阵营。
----------------------------------------------------
我还以为自己是守序邪恶呢
123#
发表于 2008-5-16 13:00:09 | 只看该作者
混乱善良一如既往的强大啊,
藕虽然也混乱了,但仍不愿意为他人付出,
所以藕的阵营混乱中立
122#
发表于 2008-4-27 13:35:23 | 只看该作者
Chaotic Good
121#
发表于 2008-4-20 09:43:52 | 只看该作者
绝对中立还分"平衡者"与"无立场者",前者是德鲁伊,后者是动物.....与一般人.
多数人还是无立场者

诶,上面提到了.无立场者与平衡者囧
PS:哪来那么多善良阵营的家伙....都老实的把自己划回中立阵营里来吧,这里不是天堂.世界还是无立场者强势呀.守序善良更是已经绝种了.
120#
发表于 2008-4-16 17:06:08 | 只看该作者
绝对中立(Neutral):成为中立的人物似乎是个好主意。在善良与邪恶、秩序与混乱之间他们并不特别遵循其中某一者。大部分中立者是因其没有特别的坚信和偏爱而成中立,他们并不致力于维持事物中立的状态。这样的人认为善良比邪恶要好,他们也更愿意有善良而非邪恶的邻居和统治者。尽管如此,他并不承诺在任何情况或全体方式中亲身支援良善。另一方面,某些中立人物委身于中立的哲学观点。他们认为善良、邪恶、秩序、混乱都是偏见和危险的极端观点。他们提倡中立之路,认为从长远看它是最好最平衡的道路。中立的寻常称谓是“真正中立”。中立是一个行动自然不持偏见强迫的阵营。


[s:2] 偶一直以为我是 真实混乱涅。。。一念之差就觉对中立了
119#
发表于 2008-4-13 14:28:49 | 只看该作者
守序中立(Lawful Neutral):守序中立的人行动时遵从法律、传统或个人信条的指导。秩序和组织对他来说至关重要。他也许信仰某些私人法则,并按某种信条或道德标准生活;他也可能信仰适用于所有人的秩序,并且喜欢稳固强大有组织的政府。守序中立的寻常称谓是“真正守序”。守序中立是一个可*重荣誉且不狂热盲目的阵营。
118#
发表于 2008-4-13 11:24:07 | 只看该作者
也许是我的阵营问题吧,我玩暗黑2的首选职业是圣骑士,玩BG2一样还是圣骑士。
117#
发表于 2008-4-9 08:04:11 | 只看该作者
Lawful Good 守序善良
116#
发表于 2008-4-6 13:42:46 | 只看该作者
獲選者想要絕對中立,城主卻給了他守序善良。
115#
发表于 2008-4-5 11:50:36 | 只看该作者
守序中立
114#
发表于 2008-4-4 18:21:01 | 只看该作者
守序善良,我就知道会是这样。从小就没有太多做坏事的念头,以至于常常受人欺负。
113#
发表于 2008-3-18 18:43:18 | 只看该作者
绝对中立(Neutral):成为中立的人物似乎是个好主意。在善良与邪恶、秩序与混乱之间他们并不特别遵循其中某一者。大部分中立者是因其没有特别的坚信和偏爱而成中立,他们并不致力于维持事物中立的状态。这样的人认为善良比邪恶要好,他们也更愿意有善良而非邪恶的邻居和统治者。尽管如此,他并不承诺在任何情况或全体方式中亲身支援良善。另一方面,某些中立人物委身于中立的哲学观点。他们认为善良、邪恶、秩序、混乱都是偏见和危险的极端观点。他们提倡中立之路,认为从长远看它是最好最平衡的道路。中立的寻常称谓是“真正中立”。中立是一个行动自然不持偏见强迫的阵营。
Your Character’s Alignment

Based on your answers to the quiz, your character’s most likely alignment is Neutral.

Neutral

A neutral character does what seems to be a good idea. She doesn’t feel strongly one way or the other when it comes to good vs. evil or law vs. chaos. Most neutrality is a lack of conviction or bias rather than a commitment to neutrality. Such a character thinks of good as better than evil. After all, she would rather have good neighbors and rulers than evil ones. Still, she’s not personally committed to upholding good in any abstract or universal way. Some neutral characters, on the other hand, commit themselves philosophically to neutrality. They see good, evil, law, and chaos as prejudices and dangerous extremes. They advocate the middle way of neutrality as the best, most balanced road in the long run. The common phrase for neutral is "true neutral." Neutral is the best alignment you can be because it means you act naturally, without prejudice or compulsion.

--excerpted from the Player’s Handbook, Chapter 6

Keep in mind the alignment suggested by the quiz is just that: a suggestion. It describes your character no better than a 36-question test would describe you. But it’s a good way to start thinking about how your character acts when confronted with issues of alignment.

Now that your character has taken the test, make a note of which questions scored in the opposite direction from your overall alignment. These exceptions can tell some interesting tales about your character Are you a good character with a greedy streak? Are you a lawful character who can’t stand the village elders? Don’t just roleplay your alignment -- roleplay your alignment exceptions, too. Few characters perfectly embody their alignment choice.

Try the test again



Changing Alignment

From time to time (say every three to five levels), it might be a good idea to retake this alignment test to see whether your character is experiencing "alignment drift." Perhaps you intended him to walk the straight and narrow, but (having fallen in with bad company), he’s becoming increasingly comfortable with behavior that would make his mentors blush. Or perhaps you intended her as a hard-bitten cynic, yet find that she’s the one who makes sure the rescued survivors get safely back to town, sometimes slipping them a few gold pieces to replace their losses.

Don’t despair: People change over time, and characters do too. Some become more lawful (there’s nothing like amassing a stockpile of loot to make you want banditry and thieving to stop). Others relax their earlier strictures to embrace a more flexible approach. The alignment you choose while creating the character may not be the alignment that best fits how you play that character. Retaking the test later on also has the advantage that, instead of abstract conditions, you can plug in specific examples of how the character behaved when faced with any of the situations outlined in the "test."

Note that some characters (paladins, clerics, monks) suffer consequences of shifting alignment. Consider this test a qualifying exam for beginning characters in this class ("Well, you seem to score poorly on lawfulness, Sir Eadgar -- are you sure you want to be a paladin?") and a moral and ethical compass for those already on their chosen path.
112#
发表于 2008-3-16 21:28:07 | 只看该作者
我居然是“绝对中立”,一直以来自认为是混乱善良或守序邪恶呢
111#
发表于 2008-3-15 00:14:26 | 只看该作者
守序中立是一个可尊重荣誉且不狂热盲目的阵营
110#
发表于 2008-3-14 20:39:28 | 只看该作者
守序中立
109#
发表于 2008-3-13 13:32:58 | 只看该作者
Neutral Good..
108#
发表于 2008-3-11 04:53:14 | 只看该作者
Neutral Good..
这老贴是谁翻上来的。。
107#
发表于 2008-3-3 20:40:25 | 只看该作者
对比一下数据:
善良>中立>邪恶,混乱> 中立>守序。(混乱善良倾向……)
队形真整齐啊……混乱邪恶是唯一的例外,看来疯狂的还是少数。邪恶的果然是少数,可怜的少数派。混乱善良果然是最受欢迎的,恐怖的领先地位啊,好像不少著名人士都是混乱善良,很好很强大啊。
106#
发表于 2008-3-1 09:41:46 | 只看该作者
叛逆邪恶~哇哈哈~无耻在游戏中是一种美德...
105#
发表于 2008-3-1 09:35:08 | 只看该作者
我玩游戏一直是守序善良...
现在可能是混乱善良吧
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

手机版|小黑屋|Archiver|13号避难所

GMT+8, 2024-7-3 13:05 , Processed in 0.092539 second(s), 14 queries .

快速评论 返回顶部 返回列表